Voting Rights Act: Protection of Minority Voting, Redistricting

This comprehensive guide explores the Voting Rights Act of 1965, focusing on the protection of minority voting rights and the complexities of redistricting, including key provisions, legal principles, and significant Supreme Court cases.

The Voting Rights Act (VRA) of 1965 is a landmark piece of federal legislation in the United States that aims to eliminate racial discrimination in voting. This comprehensive guide explores the VRA's provisions, particularly focusing on the protection of minority voting rights and the intricacies of redistricting.

Introduction

The Voting Rights Act was enacted during the Civil Rights Movement to address the pervasive racial discrimination that prevented African Americans and other minorities from exercising their right to vote. The Act has been amended several times to expand its protections and address new challenges. This guide will delve into the key sections of the VRA, the legal principles governing redistricting, and the ongoing efforts to protect minority voting rights.

Key Provisions of the Voting Rights Act

Section 2: Prohibition of Voting Practices that Discriminate on the Basis of Race

Section 2 of the VRA prohibits any voting practice or procedure that results in the denial or abridgment of the right to vote on account of race or color. This section is a permanent, nationwide prohibition against racial discrimination in voting.

Under Section 2, a voting practice is considered discriminatory if it has the effect of diluting minority voting strength. The courts use a "totality of circumstances" test to determine whether a practice violates Section 2. This involves examining factors such as the history of voting-related discrimination in the jurisdiction, the extent to which minority group members have been elected to public office, and the use of voting practices that may enhance the opportunity for discrimination.

Official Link: Guidance under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act

Section 5: Preclearance Requirement

Section 5 of the VRA required certain jurisdictions with a history of discrimination to obtain federal approval, or "preclearance," before implementing any changes to their voting laws or practices. This provision was designed to prevent discriminatory practices before they could take effect.

Shelby County v. Holder

In 2013, the Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder invalidated the coverage formula used to determine which jurisdictions were subject to preclearance. As a result, Section 5 is effectively inoperative unless Congress enacts a new coverage formula.

Official Link: Guidance Concerning Redistricting Under Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act

Section 203: Language Minority Provisions

Section 203 requires certain jurisdictions to provide bilingual voting materials and assistance to voters who are members of a language minority group. This provision aims to ensure that language barriers do not prevent eligible voters from participating in the electoral process.

Official Link: Section 203 Language Determinations - U.S. Census Bureau

Redistricting and the Voting Rights Act

Redistricting is the process of redrawing electoral district boundaries to reflect changes in population. This process occurs every ten years following the decennial census. The VRA plays a crucial role in ensuring that redistricting does not dilute minority voting strength.

One Person, One Vote

The principle of "one person, one vote" requires that electoral districts be roughly equal in population. This ensures that each person's vote has equal weight in the electoral process.

Racial Gerrymandering

Racial gerrymandering refers to the deliberate manipulation of district boundaries to disadvantage a racial group. The Supreme Court has held that racial gerrymandering violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Official Link: Racial Vote Dilution and Racial Gerrymandering | Library of Congress

Key Cases in Redistricting

Thornburg v. Gingles (1986)

In Thornburg v. Gingles, the Supreme Court established a three-part test for determining whether a redistricting plan violates Section 2 of the VRA. The test requires plaintiffs to show that:

  1. The minority group is sufficiently large and geographically compact to constitute a majority in a single-member district.
  2. The minority group is politically cohesive.
  3. The majority votes sufficiently as a bloc to enable it to usually defeat the minority's preferred candidate.

Shaw v. Reno (1993)

In Shaw v. Reno, the Supreme Court held that redistricting plans that use race as the predominant factor in drawing district lines are subject to strict scrutiny. This means that the state must show that the use of race is narrowly tailored to achieve a compelling governmental interest.

Official Link: 21-1086 Allen v. Milligan (06/08/2023) - Supreme Court

Current Challenges and Developments

Recent Supreme Court Decisions

The Supreme Court continues to play a significant role in shaping the application of the VRA. Recent decisions have addressed issues such as the constitutionality of Section 5's coverage formula and the standards for proving racial gerrymandering.

Legislative Efforts

There have been ongoing legislative efforts to restore and strengthen the VRA. Proposals include updating the coverage formula for Section 5 and enhancing protections against discriminatory voting practices.

Official Link: Attorney General Ford Joins Coalition Urging Supreme Court Not to Weaken Voting Rights Act Protections in Alabama Redistricting Case

Conclusion

The Voting Rights Act remains a vital tool in the fight against racial discrimination in voting. While significant progress has been made, challenges persist, and ongoing vigilance is necessary to ensure that all citizens can exercise their right to vote. The protection of minority voting rights and the fair redistricting of electoral boundaries are essential to maintaining a democratic and just society.

Additional Resources:

This guide aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the Voting Rights Act and its role in protecting minority voting rights and ensuring fair redistricting practices. For more detailed information, readers are encouraged to consult the official resources and legal texts referenced throughout this article.

About the author
Counsel Stack

Counsel Stack

Helpful legal information and resources

Counsel Stack Learn

Free and helpful legal information

Counsel Stack Learn

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Counsel Stack Learn.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.