Trade Secret Misappropriation: Civil Claims, Criminal Prosecution

This legal guide provides a comprehensive overview of trade secret misappropriation, covering civil claims, criminal prosecution, legal frameworks, defenses, remedies, and preventive measures to help businesses protect their valuable intellectual property.

Introduction

Trade secrets are a crucial aspect of intellectual property that provide businesses with a competitive edge. The misappropriation of trade secrets can lead to significant financial losses and damage to a company's reputation. This legal guide aims to provide a comprehensive overview of trade secret misappropriation, focusing on both civil claims and criminal prosecution. We will explore the legal framework, key statutes, defenses, and remedies available to victims of trade secret theft.

Understanding Trade Secrets

Definition of Trade Secrets

A trade secret is defined as any information that derives independent economic value from not being generally known or readily ascertainable by others who can obtain economic value from its disclosure or use. This can include formulas, practices, processes, designs, instruments, patterns, or compilations of information.

The legal framework for trade secret protection in the United States is primarily governed by the following statutes:

  • Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA): Adopted by most states, the UTSA provides a uniform legal framework for the protection of trade secrets.
  • Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA): A federal statute that allows for civil actions in federal court for trade secret misappropriation.
  • Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA): A federal law that criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets.

Civil Claims for Trade Secret Misappropriation

Under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA), individuals and businesses can bring civil actions in federal court for the misappropriation of trade secrets. The DTSA provides a federal cause of action, allowing plaintiffs to seek remedies such as injunctions, damages, and attorney's fees.

Relevant Statutes

Elements of a Civil Claim

To succeed in a civil claim for trade secret misappropriation, the plaintiff must establish the following elements:

  1. Existence of a Trade Secret: The information in question must qualify as a trade secret under the law.
  2. Misappropriation: The defendant must have acquired, disclosed, or used the trade secret through improper means.
  3. Damages: The plaintiff must demonstrate that they suffered damages as a result of the misappropriation.

Remedies in Civil Claims

Injunctive Relief

Courts can issue injunctions to prevent further misappropriation or to compel the return of misappropriated trade secrets. Injunctive relief can be temporary or permanent, depending on the circumstances of the case.

Monetary Damages

Plaintiffs can seek monetary damages for the actual loss caused by the misappropriation and any unjust enrichment obtained by the defendant. In cases of willful and malicious misappropriation, courts may award exemplary damages up to twice the amount of actual damages.

Attorney's Fees

Under the DTSA, courts may award reasonable attorney's fees to the prevailing party in cases of willful and malicious misappropriation or if the claim was made in bad faith.

Case Law Examples

Hanneman Family Funeral Home & Crematorium v. Orians

In this case, the Ohio Supreme Court addressed issues related to trade secret misappropriation. The court's decision provides valuable insights into the application of trade secret laws at the state level. Read the full case.

Criminal Prosecution for Trade Secret Misappropriation

The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 (EEA) criminalizes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets. The EEA provides for severe penalties, including fines and imprisonment, for individuals and organizations found guilty of trade secret theft.

Relevant Statutes

  • 18 USC Ch. 90: Protection of trade secrets under the Economic Espionage Act.

Elements of a Criminal Offense

To secure a conviction for trade secret theft under the EEA, the prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. Existence of a Trade Secret: The information in question must qualify as a trade secret under the law.
  2. Intent: The defendant must have intended to convert the trade secret for the benefit of someone other than the owner.
  3. Interstate or Foreign Commerce: The trade secret must be related to a product or service used in or intended for use in interstate or foreign commerce.

Penalties for Criminal Offenses

Fines and Imprisonment

Individuals convicted of trade secret theft under the EEA can face fines of up to $5 million and imprisonment for up to 10 years. Organizations can face fines of up to $10 million or three times the value of the stolen trade secret, whichever is greater.

Forfeiture

The EEA also provides for the forfeiture of any property derived from or used to commit trade secret theft. This can include financial assets, equipment, and other property.

Case Law Examples

United States v. Liew

In this high-profile case, Walter Liew was convicted of economic espionage and theft of trade secrets related to DuPont's titanium dioxide technology. The case highlights the severe penalties and legal complexities involved in criminal trade secret prosecutions. Read more about the case.

Defenses to Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims

Common Defenses in Civil Cases

Independent Development

A defendant may argue that they independently developed the information in question without using the plaintiff's trade secrets. This defense requires substantial evidence of independent research and development efforts.

Reverse Engineering

Reverse engineering involves analyzing a product to determine its design, structure, or composition. If a defendant can demonstrate that they obtained the information through reverse engineering, they may avoid liability for trade secret misappropriation.

If the plaintiff consented to the use or disclosure of the trade secret, the defendant may use this as a defense. Consent can be explicit or implied, depending on the circumstances.

Common Defenses in Criminal Cases

Lack of Intent

In criminal cases, the prosecution must prove that the defendant intended to convert the trade secret for the benefit of someone other than the owner. A defendant may argue that they lacked the requisite intent to commit the offense.

Public Domain

If the information in question is already in the public domain, it cannot qualify as a trade secret. A defendant may argue that the information was publicly available and not subject to trade secret protection.

Preventive Measures and Best Practices

Protecting Trade Secrets

Businesses can take several steps to protect their trade secrets and minimize the risk of misappropriation:

  1. Confidentiality Agreements: Require employees, contractors, and business partners to sign confidentiality agreements.
  2. Access Controls: Limit access to trade secrets to only those individuals who need to know the information.
  3. Employee Training: Educate employees about the importance of trade secret protection and the company's policies.
  4. Monitoring and Auditing: Regularly monitor and audit access to trade secrets to detect any unauthorized use or disclosure.

Responding to Trade Secret Misappropriation

If a business suspects that its trade secrets have been misappropriated, it should take the following steps:

  1. Conduct an Internal Investigation: Gather evidence and assess the extent of the misappropriation.
  2. Seek Legal Counsel: Consult with an attorney experienced in trade secret law to evaluate legal options.
  3. File a Civil Lawsuit: Consider filing a civil lawsuit under the DTSA or state trade secret laws.
  4. Report to Law Enforcement: In cases of criminal trade secret theft, report the incident to law enforcement authorities.

Conclusion

Trade secret misappropriation poses significant risks to businesses and can result in severe legal consequences for offenders. Understanding the legal framework, elements of civil and criminal claims, and available defenses is crucial for both protecting trade secrets and responding to misappropriation. By implementing preventive measures and seeking legal recourse when necessary, businesses can safeguard their valuable intellectual property and maintain their competitive edge.

References

  1. 18 USC § 1836: Civil proceedings
  2. 18 USC Ch. 90: Protection of Trade Secrets
  3. United States Department of Justice - Defenses
  4. Hanneman Family Funeral Home & Crematorium v. Orians
  5. Combating Economic Espionage and Trade Secret Theft - FBI

By following the guidelines and legal principles outlined in this guide, businesses and legal practitioners can navigate the complexities of trade secret misappropriation and take appropriate action to protect valuable intellectual property.

About the author
Von Wooding, Esq.

Von Wooding, Esq.

Lawyer and Founder

Counsel Stack Learn

Free and helpful legal information

Find a Lawyer
Counsel Stack Learn

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Counsel Stack Learn.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.