Deportation and Removal Defense: Immigration Court, Legal Representation

This comprehensive guide explores deportation and removal defense in U.S. immigration law, covering legal processes, strategies, and the critical role of representation in immigration court proceedings.

Introduction

Deportation and removal defense is a critical aspect of immigration law in the United States. It encompasses the legal processes and strategies used to prevent non-citizens from being removed from the country. This area of law is particularly relevant in today's political climate, where immigration policies and enforcement practices are subject to intense scrutiny and debate.

The immigration court system, overseen by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), plays a central role in deportation and removal proceedings. Legal representation in these cases is crucial, as the complexities of immigration law can be overwhelming for individuals facing removal. This guide aims to provide a comprehensive overview of deportation and removal defense, focusing on the immigration court process and the importance of legal representation.

The concept of deportation has been a part of U.S. immigration law since the late 19th century. However, the modern framework for removal proceedings was established by the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, with significant amendments made by subsequent legislation, including the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996.

Over time, the grounds for deportation have expanded, and the procedures have become more complex. The creation of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in 2003 further changed the landscape, with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) taking on the role of enforcing immigration laws and initiating removal proceedings.

Applicable Laws and Regulations

The primary source of immigration law in the United States is the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), codified in Title 8 of the United States Code. This comprehensive statute outlines the grounds for deportation, relief from removal, and the procedures for immigration court proceedings.

Key sections of the INA relevant to deportation and removal defense include:

  • INA § 237 (8 U.S.C. § 1227): Grounds for deportation
  • INA § 240 (8 U.S.C. § 1229a): Removal proceedings
  • INA § 208 (8 U.S.C. § 1158): Asylum
  • INA § 240A (8 U.S.C. § 1229b): Cancellation of removal

Additionally, federal regulations in Title 8 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) provide detailed rules for implementing the INA.

Relevant Regulatory Bodies

Several government agencies are involved in the deportation and removal process:

  1. Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR): Part of the Department of Justice, EOIR oversees the immigration courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals.
  2. Department of Homeland Security (DHS): The parent agency responsible for immigration enforcement.
  3. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): A component of DHS that initiates removal proceedings and represents the government in immigration court.
  4. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS): Another component of DHS that adjudicates immigration benefits and can initiate removal proceedings in certain cases.

Key Components of Deportation and Removal Defense

Notice to Appear (NTA)

The removal process typically begins with the issuance of a Notice to Appear (NTA) by DHS. This document outlines the allegations against the non-citizen and the statutory grounds for removal. The NTA also provides information about the date and location of the initial hearing before an immigration judge.

Master Calendar Hearing

The first appearance in immigration court is usually a master calendar hearing. During this hearing, the immigration judge explains the charges, informs the respondent of their rights, and sets deadlines for filing applications for relief from removal.

Individual Hearing

Also known as a merits hearing, this is where the respondent presents their case for relief from removal. Evidence is submitted, witnesses may testify, and both the respondent's attorney and the government attorney (from ICE's Office of the Principal Legal Advisor) present arguments.

Forms of Relief from Removal

There are various forms of relief that may be available to individuals in removal proceedings, including:

  1. Asylum: For those who fear persecution in their home country based on protected grounds.
  2. Withholding of Removal: Similar to asylum but with a higher burden of proof and fewer benefits.
  3. Protection under the Convention Against Torture (CAT): For those who fear torture in their home country.
  4. Cancellation of Removal: Available to certain long-term residents who meet specific criteria.
  5. Adjustment of Status: For those eligible to obtain lawful permanent residence.

Appeals

If the immigration judge denies relief, the respondent may appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). Further appeals may be made to the federal circuit courts and, in rare cases, to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Rights and Responsibilities in Removal Proceedings

Rights of Respondents

Individuals in removal proceedings have several important rights:

  1. The right to be represented by counsel (at no expense to the government)
  2. The right to a hearing before an immigration judge
  3. The right to present evidence and witnesses
  4. The right to examine the evidence against them
  5. The right to appeal adverse decisions

Responsibilities of Respondents

Respondents also have responsibilities, including:

  1. Attending all scheduled hearings
  2. Providing accurate information to the court and DHS
  3. Complying with court orders and deadlines
  4. Updating the court and DHS of any changes in address

Having competent legal representation is crucial in removal proceedings. Immigration law is complex, and the consequences of deportation can be severe. An experienced immigration attorney can:

  1. Analyze the case for potential defenses and forms of relief
  2. Gather and present evidence effectively
  3. Navigate procedural requirements and deadlines
  4. Cross-examine government witnesses
  5. Present legal arguments to the immigration judge

Recognizing the importance of legal representation, the EOIR maintains a List of Pro Bono Legal Service Providers. This list includes non-profit organizations and attorneys who have committed to providing free or low-cost legal services to individuals in immigration proceedings.

These pro bono providers often offer services such as:

  • Legal orientation for those in removal proceedings
  • Representation in asylum cases
  • Assistance with adjustment of status applications
  • Representation in cancellation of removal cases

The availability of these services can be crucial for individuals who cannot afford private attorneys but face the complex and high-stakes process of removal proceedings.

Common Issues and Challenges in Removal Defense

Language Barriers

Many respondents in removal proceedings are not fluent in English. While the immigration court provides interpreters, language barriers can still complicate the preparation of the case and communication between the respondent and their attorney.

Detention

Some individuals facing removal are held in immigration detention facilities. This can make it more difficult to gather evidence, communicate with family members, and meet with attorneys.

Complexity of Immigration Law

Immigration law is notoriously complex, with frequent changes in policies and interpretations. This can make it challenging for respondents to understand their rights and options without legal assistance.

Backlogs in Immigration Courts

The immigration court system faces significant backlogs, with cases often taking years to be resolved. This can create uncertainty and stress for respondents and their families.

Case Studies and Notable Examples

Matter of A-B-

In this 2018 case, then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions overruled a previous BIA decision and narrowed the circumstances under which victims of domestic violence or gang violence could qualify for asylum. This decision significantly impacted many asylum seekers' cases.

Pereira v. Sessions

This 2018 Supreme Court case addressed the requirements for a valid Notice to Appear (NTA). The Court held that an NTA that does not specify the time and place of the removal proceedings does not trigger the "stop-time rule" for purposes of cancellation of removal.

Best Practices and Compliance Strategies

  1. Seek legal counsel as early as possible in the removal process.
  2. Maintain thorough documentation of all interactions with immigration authorities.
  3. Comply with all court orders and attend all scheduled hearings.
  4. Be honest and consistent in all statements to immigration officials and the court.
  5. Explore all potential forms of relief from removal.
  6. Stay informed about changes in immigration law and policy that may affect your case.

Recent Developments and Proposed Changes

The Fairness to Freedom Act of 2023

This proposed legislation aims to expand access to legal representation in immigration proceedings. According to a summary of the bill, it would amend 8 U.S.C. § 1362 to provide that any person in removal, exclusion, deportation, bond, or expedited removal proceedings who is financially unable to obtain adequate representation shall be entitled to have counsel appointed to represent them at government expense.

If passed, this act could significantly change the landscape of legal representation in removal proceedings, potentially reducing the number of unrepresented respondents and improving access to justice in the immigration court system.

Resources for Further Information

  1. Executive Office for Immigration Review: Provides information on immigration court procedures, forms, and statistics.
  2. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services: Offers details on various immigration benefits and forms, including the I-589 Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal.
  3. Immigration and Customs Enforcement: Provides information on enforcement policies and practices, including the role of ICE attorneys in removal proceedings through the Office of the Principal Legal Advisor.
  4. American Immigration Lawyers Association (AILA): A professional organization of immigration attorneys that provides resources and updates on immigration law.
  5. Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC): Offers practice advisories and educational materials on various aspects of immigration law, including removal defense.

In conclusion, deportation and removal defense is a complex area of law that requires careful navigation. Understanding the immigration court process, the importance of legal representation, and the various forms of relief available is crucial for anyone facing removal proceedings. As immigration policies continue to evolve, staying informed and seeking competent legal counsel remain the best strategies for protecting one's rights in the face of potential deportation.

About the author
Von Wooding, Esq.

Von Wooding, Esq.

Lawyer and Founder

Counsel Stack Learn

Free and helpful legal information

Find a Lawyer
Counsel Stack Learn

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Counsel Stack Learn.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.