Key Takeaways
- Cardi B’s defamation lawsuit against YouTuber Tasha K resulted in a landmark victory, with a federal court awarding Cardi B over $4 million in damages, later settled for $1.2 million.
- Cardi B has faced additional legal disputes, including copyright infringement claims and a non-payment lawsuit related to property use for a music video.
- These cases highlight the legal complexities faced by public figures in the digital age, especially regarding defamation, intellectual property, and contractual obligations.
Cardi B’s Defamation Lawsuit Against Tasha K
Background and Allegations
In 2019, Cardi B (Belcalis Marlenis Almánzar) filed a defamation lawsuit against Latasha Kebe, known online as Tasha K, a YouTuber with a significant following. The lawsuit alleged that Tasha K published a series of videos containing false and damaging statements about Cardi B. These statements included allegations of illicit drug use, prostitution, and sexually transmitted infections. Cardi B asserted that these claims were not only untrue but also caused her significant emotional distress and reputational harm.
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. Cardi B’s legal team argued that Tasha K’s statements were made with actual malice, a key standard for defamation involving public figures under U.S. law. Tasha K, in her defense, claimed her statements were either true or protected opinions.
Court Proceedings and Verdict
The trial began in January 2022. Cardi B testified about the emotional impact of the defamatory statements, including anxiety and depression. The jury found in favor of Cardi B, concluding that Tasha K had acted with actual malice and that her statements were not protected by the First Amendment.
The court awarded Cardi B over $4 million in damages, which included $1.25 million in general damages, $1.5 million in punitive damages, and $1.3 million to cover legal fees (NBC News). The verdict sent a strong message about the seriousness of defamation, especially when amplified by social media platforms.
Bankruptcy and Settlement
Following the verdict, Tasha K filed for bankruptcy, seeking relief from the substantial financial judgment. However, the court ordered that she must still pay Cardi B more than $3.4 million, emphasizing that bankruptcy does not automatically discharge debts arising from willful and malicious injury (Billboard).
In February 2025, the parties reached a settlement agreement. Tasha K agreed to pay Cardi B $1.2 million over five years (BET). The settlement also included a stipulation that Tasha K refrain from making further disparaging public comments about Cardi B and her family (The Grio). This resolution marked a significant step in Cardi B receiving compensation and protecting her reputation.
Legal Significance
This case is notable for several reasons. First, it demonstrates the potential consequences of defamatory statements made online, especially by influencers with large audiences. Second, it highlights the legal standards for defamation involving public figures, including the requirement to prove actual malice. Finally, the case illustrates the limits of bankruptcy protection in cases involving intentional wrongdoing.
Copyright Infringement Lawsuits
Allegations by McAllen Artists
In addition to the defamation lawsuit, Cardi B has faced copyright infringement claims. In 2024, McAllen artists Joshua Fraustro and Miguel Aguilar (known as Kemika1956) filed a lawsuit alleging that Cardi B used their song without permission (Valley Central). The artists claimed that Cardi B’s work incorporated elements of their original composition, violating their intellectual property rights.
"Enough (Miami)" Dispute
A separate copyright infringement claim was filed over Cardi B’s single "Enough (Miami)". The same producers, Fraustro and Aguilar, alleged that Cardi B used the beat from their song without authorization (Variety). Cardi B’s legal team moved to dismiss the lawsuit, arguing that the claims lacked merit and that the works were not substantially similar (Bloomberg Law).
Broader Implications
These copyright disputes underscore the challenges artists face in the music industry. Sampling, collaboration, and digital distribution can blur the lines of ownership and originality. For public figures like Cardi B, such lawsuits can have significant financial and reputational consequences, even if the claims are ultimately dismissed.
Non-Payment Lawsuit Over Mansion Use
The Lawsuit
Another legal issue involved a non-payment lawsuit related to the use of a mansion for a music video. The property owners alleged that Cardi B and her estranged husband, Offset, failed to fulfill their financial obligations for the use of the property (Billboard). The lawsuit claimed breach of contract and sought damages for unpaid fees.
Cardi B’s Response
Cardi B publicly responded to the lawsuit, stating her intention to contest the claims in court. She denied any wrongdoing and asserted that she had complied with all contractual terms. The outcome of this case remains pending as of the time of writing.
Legal Context
This dispute highlights the importance of clear contractual agreements in the entertainment industry. Artists and their teams must ensure that all terms are documented and that obligations are met to avoid litigation. Such cases are common in the industry, reflecting the complex logistics of music video production and property rentals.
The Broader Legal Landscape for Public Figures
Defamation in the Digital Age
Cardi B’s legal battles, especially the defamation case against Tasha K, illustrate the evolving landscape of defamation law in the era of social media. Public figures are increasingly vulnerable to false statements that can spread rapidly online. The legal system provides recourse, but the burden of proof is high, requiring evidence of actual malice.
Intellectual Property Challenges
Copyright infringement claims are a persistent issue in the music industry. The ease of sharing and remixing content online increases the risk of disputes. Artists must be vigilant in securing rights and permissions for all elements of their work.
Contractual Disputes
Non-payment and breach of contract lawsuits are also common, particularly in high-value transactions involving property, services, or collaborations. These cases emphasize the need for detailed contracts and clear communication between parties.
Conclusion
Cardi B’s recent legal battles provide a window into the complex legal environment faced by modern artists and public figures. From defamation and copyright infringement to contractual disputes, these cases demonstrate the importance of legal protections and the potential consequences of online conduct. As Cardi B continues to navigate these challenges, her experiences offer valuable lessons for others in the entertainment industry.
For attorneys and legal professionals seeking deeper insights or case law, visit Counsel Stack for comprehensive legal research tools.
Disclaimer: This guide is an overview of publicly available information regarding Cardi B’s legal cases. It is not legal advice. Some cases discussed are ongoing; all information is based on current allegations and court filings and may change as new developments arise. For specific legal advice, consult a qualified attorney.
