An Overview of § 1756 under the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL)

Section 1756 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), titled Subrogation, establishes the entitlement of the Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee to reimbursement for specific costs paid to eligible claimants.

Statutory Text

§ 1756. Subrogation.

The Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee is entitled to recover, in accordance with the tort liability law of this Commonwealth, reimbursement for benefits or coverages paid, loss adjustment costs and any other sums paid to an eligible claimant under this subchapter.

Key Terms Definition:


In the context of automobile law, subrogation refers to the legal right of a party (usually an insurance company) to make a payment that is owed by others and then collect this amount from the party primarily responsible for the loss.

Assigned Claims Plan:

This is a mechanism intended to provide a payment source for claimants who have sustained damages in an automobile accident caused by an unidentified, uninsured, or financially insolvent motorist.

Tort Liability Law:

This is a set of laws that provides remedies to individuals harmed by the unreasonable actions of others. In Pennsylvania, tort liability law forms the basis for determining who is responsible and liable for damages in a motor vehicle accident.

Why Section 1756 Matters for Pennsylvanian Drivers:

This section matters for Pennsylvania drivers as it plays a crucial role in determining their financial responsibility post-accident. If a driver is at fault in an accident, their insurance company may pay for the damages, but under the principle of subrogation, the insurance company will seek to recover these costs from the at-fault driver.

Why Section 1756 Matters for Pennsylvania Attorneys:

Section 1756 is significant for Pennsylvania attorneys as it directly impacts the management of their client's claims and potential liabilities. Attorneys must have a deep understanding of this section to advise clients appropriately and ensure claims and liabilities are handled in accordance with the law.

Advanced Analysis of the Section 1756 Language:

The language of section 1756 is notably precise and explicit. It clearly outlines the entitled parties (Assigned Claims Plan or its assignee), the conditions under which the entitlement applies (in accordance with the tort liability law), the types of expenses eligible for reimbursement (benefits or coverages paid, loss adjustment costs, any other sums paid), and the recipient of the sums (an eligible claimant). This exactness minimizes ambiguities and facilitates clear understanding and implementation of the law.

However, the term "any other sums paid" is a broad, catch-all phrase, the interpretation of which could vary in different circumstances. Several determinants, such as court rulings and previous legal precedents, will mould its precise meaning.

This section, with its clear emphasis on the entitlement of the Assigned Claims Plan to reimbursement, underpins the principle of accountability in Pennsylvania's automobile accident laws. As such, it aligns with the broader aim of the MVFRL - to ensure that the financial burden of damages from automobile accidents ultimately falls upon the parties responsible for causing them.

About the author
Von Wooding

Von Wooding

Counsel Stack develops grounded language models equipped with research, retrieval, and drafting tools. We offer legal leads, pre-built intelligent applications, and white label solutions.

Counsel Stack Learn

Counsel Stack Learn is a comprehensive tech education center built to help attorneys maintain professional competence.

Counsel Stack Learn

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Counsel Stack Learn.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.