An Overview of § 1744 under the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL)

Section 1744, titled "Termination of Policies," pertains to the rules governing the cancellation, refusal to renew, and other termination of policies issued under the Assigned Risk Plan.

Statutory Text

§ 1744. Termination of policies.

Cancellation, refusal to renew and other termination of policies issued under the Assigned Risk Plan shall be in accordance with the rules of the plan.

Key Terms Defined:

Assigned Risk Plan:

This is a mechanism used to ensure coverage is available to drivers who cannot obtain insurance in the regular market due to a high risk profile.


In this context, cancellation refers to the annulment or termination of an insurance policy before its expiration date.

Refusal to renew:

This denotes a situation wherein the insurer decides not to extend coverage beyond the current policy term.


Reflecting an end to the insurance contract under certain prescribed circumstances.

Relevance to Pennsylvanian Drivers:

This section is crucial for Pennsylvanian drivers as it delineates the circumstances under which their insurance policies might be terminated, offering insights into their rights and responsibilities. Given that the Assigned Risk Plan caters to high-risk drivers, its comprehension is vital to a segment of drivers typically facing higher rates and limited options.

Relevance to Pennsylvania Attorneys:

Pennsylvania attorneys concentrating on automobile laws would benefit from a deep understanding of this section. As professionals providing advice or representing drivers in cases involving policy termination or disputes, their grasp of these regulations would directly impact the quality of their legal counsel.

Advanced Analysis of Language:

The language used in § 1744 appears concise, rendering application. However, the use of "shall be in accordance with the rules of the plan" indicates the existence of a set of guiding principles that control the cancellation, refusal to renew and termination of policies within the Assigned Risk Plan.

This language implies an inherent expectation of due diligence while executing these processes, necessitating anyone involved with these Plans to seek and articulate these specific governing rules. Although the section does not detail the conditions of these terminations, it refers to Subchapter E, indicating that more detailed provisions and guidelines can be found there.

In summary, § 1744 serves as a pointer, directing individuals to the necessary statutes that govern the execution of terminations under the Assigned Risk Plan. This straightforward yet critical directive reflects the aim of the MVFRL to ensure comprehensible and accessible insurance coverage rules, promoting transparency and fairness in their dealings with high-risk drivers.

About the author
Von Wooding, Esq.

Von Wooding, Esq.

Lawyer and Founder

Counsel Stack Learn

Free and helpful legal information

Find a Lawyer
Counsel Stack Learn

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Counsel Stack Learn.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.