Informal Rulemaking: Process, Public Participation, and Challenges

This guide offers a detailed overview of informal rulemaking, emphasizing the process, public participation, and the challenges faced by federal agencies in creating effective and transparent regulations.

Informal rulemaking is a critical process within administrative law, allowing federal agencies to create regulations that have the force of law. This guide provides a comprehensive overview of the informal rulemaking process, the role of public participation, and the challenges associated with it.

Introduction to Informal Rulemaking

Informal rulemaking, also known as "notice-and-comment rulemaking," is governed by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) of 1946. This process is used by federal agencies to issue regulations that implement and interpret statutes enacted by Congress. The APA sets forth the procedures that agencies must follow to ensure transparency, public participation, and accountability.

The APA provides the foundational legal framework for informal rulemaking. Key provisions include:

  • Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM): Agencies must publish a notice of proposed rulemaking in the Federal Register, which includes the proposed rule's text, a statement of its basis and purpose, and an invitation for public comment.
  • Public Comment Period: Agencies must provide an opportunity for the public to submit written comments on the proposed rule. This period typically lasts 30 to 60 days.
  • Final Rule: After considering public comments, the agency publishes the final rule in the Federal Register, along with a statement of the rule's basis and purpose and responses to significant comments.

For more detailed information on the APA, refer to the Administrative Procedure Act.

The Informal Rulemaking Process

The informal rulemaking process involves several key steps, each designed to ensure that regulations are developed transparently and with public input.

Step 1: Initiation of Rulemaking

Rulemaking can be initiated by various triggers, including:

  • Congressional Mandates: Statutes passed by Congress may require agencies to issue regulations.
  • Agency Initiatives: Agencies may identify the need for new regulations based on policy goals or emerging issues.
  • Petitions for Rulemaking: Individuals or organizations can petition agencies to issue, amend, or repeal regulations.

Step 2: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM)

The NPRM is a critical document in the rulemaking process. It must include:

  • Text of the Proposed Rule: The specific language of the proposed regulation.
  • Statement of Basis and Purpose: An explanation of the rule's objectives and the legal authority under which it is proposed.
  • Invitation for Public Comment: Information on how and where the public can submit comments.

The NPRM is published in the Federal Register, which is accessible at Federal Register.

Step 3: Public Comment Period

During the public comment period, stakeholders, including individuals, businesses, and advocacy groups, can submit written comments on the proposed rule. This period is crucial for gathering diverse perspectives and ensuring that the rule is well-informed.

  • Comment Submission: Comments can be submitted electronically via, by mail, or in person.
  • Comment Analysis: Agencies review and analyze all submitted comments, identifying significant issues and concerns.

Step 4: Final Rule

After considering public comments, the agency drafts the final rule. This document includes:

  • Text of the Final Rule: The finalized regulatory language.
  • Statement of Basis and Purpose: An updated explanation of the rule's objectives and responses to significant comments.
  • Effective Date: The date on which the rule will become enforceable.

The final rule is published in the Federal Register, and a comprehensive guide to the rulemaking process can be found in the Federal Register's Guide to the Rulemaking Process.

Public Participation in Informal Rulemaking

Public participation is a cornerstone of the informal rulemaking process. It ensures that regulations are developed with input from those who will be affected by them.

Importance of Public Participation

Public participation enhances the legitimacy and quality of regulations by:

  • Providing Diverse Perspectives: Stakeholders from various sectors can offer insights and data that agencies may not have considered.
  • Improving Rule Quality: Comments can identify potential issues, suggest alternatives, and provide evidence to support or oppose the proposed rule.
  • Enhancing Transparency and Accountability: Public involvement ensures that the rulemaking process is open and that agencies are accountable to the public.

Mechanisms for Public Participation

Several mechanisms facilitate public participation in the rulemaking process:

  • Public Comment Period: The primary mechanism for public input, allowing stakeholders to submit written comments.
  • Public Hearings and Meetings: Agencies may hold public hearings or meetings to gather oral comments and engage directly with stakeholders.
  • Advisory Committees: Agencies may establish advisory committees composed of experts and stakeholders to provide input on specific issues.

For more information on public participation, visit the Federal Trade Commission's Public Participation in Rulemaking Process.

Challenges to Public Participation

Despite its importance, public participation in rulemaking faces several challenges:

  • Complexity and Technicality: Proposed rules can be complex and technical, making it difficult for laypersons to understand and provide meaningful input.
  • Resource Constraints: Individuals and small organizations may lack the resources to engage fully in the rulemaking process.
  • Volume of Comments: Agencies may receive thousands of comments, making it challenging to review and respond to all input thoroughly.

Challenges in Informal Rulemaking

Informal rulemaking, while essential, is not without its challenges. These challenges can impact the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of the rulemaking process.

  • Judicial Review: Courts can review and potentially invalidate regulations if they find that the agency did not follow proper procedures or that the rule is arbitrary and capricious.
  • Compliance with APA Requirements: Agencies must meticulously follow APA procedures, and any deviation can result in legal challenges.
  • Balancing Stakeholder Interests: Agencies must balance competing interests and perspectives, which can be difficult when stakeholders have conflicting views.

Practical Challenges

  • Resource Limitations: Agencies may face resource constraints, including limited staff and funding, which can impact their ability to conduct thorough rulemaking processes.
  • Data and Information Gaps: Agencies may lack sufficient data or information to make fully informed decisions, particularly in emerging or rapidly evolving areas.
  • Political and Administrative Pressures: Agencies may face political and administrative pressures that influence the rulemaking process and outcomes.

Addressing Challenges

To address these challenges, agencies can adopt several strategies:

  • Enhanced Public Engagement: Agencies can use technology and innovative approaches to enhance public engagement and make the rulemaking process more accessible.
  • Capacity Building: Investing in staff training and resources can improve agencies' ability to conduct effective rulemaking.
  • Collaborative Approaches: Agencies can collaborate with stakeholders, including other government entities, academia, and industry, to gather data and expertise.


Informal rulemaking is a vital process that enables federal agencies to develop regulations that implement and interpret laws. The process is designed to be transparent, participatory, and accountable, ensuring that regulations are well-informed and reflective of diverse perspectives. However, the process also faces significant challenges, including legal, procedural, and practical issues. By understanding and addressing these challenges, agencies can improve the effectiveness and fairness of the rulemaking process, ultimately enhancing the quality of regulations and their impact on society.

For further reading and official resources, please refer to the following links:

By leveraging these resources and understanding the intricacies of informal rulemaking, stakeholders can better navigate and influence the regulatory landscape.

About the author
Von Wooding

Von Wooding

Helpful legal information and resources

Counsel Stack Learn

Free and helpful legal information

Counsel Stack Learn

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to Counsel Stack Learn.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.